The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it. ~ Albert Einstein

Truly a remarkable statement. What  if anything has changed since that statement was made? Has society today become so complacent that we do not see the folly of our actions? Do we no longer care about the planet which we all inhabit, the air in which we all breath, or the water we all drink? Are we all so inclined to give up our liberties without so much as a word uttered in defence?

These days judging from the response, or "lack of" for better words, it would seem that a great majority of society is quite content in letting big corporations push us aside.  As corporations the world over continually pollute our water and air, poison our food, pollute and destroy the environment and rob the land of valuable resources for their own profit, the masses stand silently still. As society moves towards a controlled surveillance state, many people are giving up their personal freedoms and civil liberties knowingly, at a great cost to humanity.

Today, one only has to turn to the media to see a deep decline in our basic human rights and civil liberties. Big corporations continue to wage war for profit. Those of us left in their wake struggle to survive, and in our struggles are labelled, unwittingly eroding our personal freedoms. Yet the elite in plain view continue to collect huge profits from atrocities perpetrated on the unsuspecting, putting all of humanity in peril. Corporate minions who control the courts and media daily spew falsehoods in order to further their agenda of world dominance. Laws favouring big business and the elite are passed to enforce and enhance their dominance while at the same time suppressing dissent. Politicians are bought and sold as if commodities, elections rigged, banks rewarded for their criminal behaviour. Still, the masses stand quiet.

Today's Real Hero's, those who choose to speak against the establishment, are now being labelled as if having a mental illness, or in extreme cases even criminal, setting them apart from the so called norm. They are cast aside by their closest allies and discredited by those who wish to silence their dissent. Systematically, they are being separated from those who have chosen to remain silent in face of adversary, further enforcing the will of the elite. How can one call this criminal, when their only wishes are to see all of humanity have a share in the worlds resources? Who was given the power to make such a judgement?

Perhaps it is the fear of retribution which has kept so many silenced. Or perhaps the falsehoods we have grown accustomed to hearing on a daily basis have finally taken their toll. Whatever it may be that keeps humanity from speaking out against such atrocities committed around the globe, must come to an end if humanity is to survive. It's time we all come together to stop the hatred and violence perpetrated against us by those who's only agenda is reaping huge profits and world dominance. We must set aside our fears and aspire change. We must now learn to stand together and not be deceived in our thinking that a better world is possible. By standing together, we can make the world a better place for all of humanity. Failure to do so affects us all and will have a grave impact on future generations, if there is to be any.

A lot may be said of the world today. Our biggest fight however, is the fight for humanity. We only have to open our eyes and our minds to see the real extent of our continued silence.

"It is not a subsidy, it's an investment. Public transportation should not be seen as a subsidy but an investment for the betterment of society."

- Linda Savory Gordon, a member of the Coalition for Algoma Passenger Trains

People are largely constructed by capitalism. Their opinions are largely constructed by capitalist media, which will always denounce anything not in the economic interest of the owners, managers, and clients of the capitalist media!

A lot has happened since the beginning of the Occupy movement. With the anniversaries of Occupy Movements around the world now unfolding, the  mainstream media seems to downplay the overall effect the movement has played going as far as to say that the Occupy Movement is dead! Nothing could be further from the truth!  One only has to look back in recent time and to countries around the world to see what can become of mass demonstrations as we have witnessed with ‘The Arab Spring’ in Egypt and ‘The Indignants’ movement in Madrid.


The Occupy Movement is ALIVE and still very active across the globe. Perhaps not yet on a scale which will bring around immediate change, but as the movement continues to grow, people everywhere are starting to take notice, as seen with the recent student uprising in Montreal, Quebec. Now over it’s 100th day, what started out as a protest against student tuitions has morphed into a protest about more  than just the cost of education. It’s becoming more about the financial bailouts of the ruling class (the 1%), corrupt government and their policies,  suppression of the people,  and the passing of unfavourable laws like bill C-10 and C-78, SOPA,  CISPA, along with a host of other bills and policies recently enacted that go strictly against or very own Charter of Rights and Freedoms. As the movement continues to expand across the globe, governments are quick to react trying to suppress the movement which has led to further hostilities arising from police brutality and in some cases the strict use of force. In Quebec alone mass arrests (over 2,500 to date) have so far failed to quell the protests and have perhaps only strengthened their resolve.

Social media has played a big part in helping to unite various movements across the country and  in getting the peoples voices heard. It has given us a glimpse into the inequality around the world and here at home. Through social media we  have seen the images of violence and atrocity currently being committed in places like Egypt and Syria, and other third world countries. Even here at home In Ontario during the protest at the G20 Summit, it has been revealed that Police violated civil rights, detained people illegally, and used excessive force.  Who is to be held accountable? The peaceful protesters exercising their rights to free speech as guaranteed through the Charter of Rights?

Yet without a true following from the main stream of media, it may be hard to determine the exact toll (pro or con), the protests are having on the local economy and policies where these mass demonstrations play out. What is evident is that the movement is far from dead and in some cases may very well be growing momentum.  Solidarity with the 99% across the country will play a big part in determining what if any gain the occupy movement will have in the coming months. As the protests move forward, it may be wise for all to keep in mind that the Occupy Movement is about more than just dollars and cents! IT’S ABOUT CHANGE!  It’s about what kind of future we want to leave for our children. It’s not a movement about the rich or poor, black or white…. it’s a movement more about EQUALITY FOR EVERYONE and not just the 1% or a select few. To achieve these goals, we must ALL STAND TOGETHER! Those who sit on the sidelines only to heckle the movement deserve no better than those who are trying to suppress it!

Taken from recent article on MSNBC News, an alarming census completed in 2010 shows that 1 in 5 children in the United States live below the poverty line. Based on the federal poverty threshold defined as an annual income of $22,314 for a family of four, children living in poverty rose 1.6 percent from 14.7 million in 2009 to 15.7 million in 2010. Despite the country's position as being one of the wealthiest in the world, the number of people living in poverty has reached an all-time high in the United States.

"Children who live in poverty, especially young children, are more likely than their peers to have cognitive and behavioural difficulties, to complete fewer years of education, and, as they grow up, to experience more years of unemployment"

A little shocked and concerned by this news as I hoped more would be, I hasty researched to see what more I may find about child poverty and poverty in general at home here in Canada. Spending a little over an hour or so looking through Statistics Canada for some answers I could not find, I did stumble upon an out-dated response from the Chief Statistician of Canada, Ivan P. Fellegi on poverty and low income. The most recent version dated September 1997, (Yes I did say September 1997) states the following:

 “Statistics Canada does not and cannot measure the level of "poverty" in Canada"...

Confused? Shocked? Perhaps we shouldn’t be knowing the current level of transparency within our Government. WTF are they talking about? How in this modern day and age with all the advances in technology can a country not compile and record better statistic’s as to the state of our economy? What have they to hide? There must be some kind of records on the current state of poverty and the decline of income over the years, even if they are afraid to talk about it. The response from our Chief Statistician reads more like a disclaimer for the Government more than anything else.

I can certainly understand from a Government’s point of view as to why they may not want to make this kind of information public yet in a free and just society, shouldn’t this be the norm? People have a right to know where we stand in the world on such issues compared to other countries. Personally, I want to see the numbers for myself. We must demand more transparency in the Government and agencies who collect this data and do away with the vague disclaimers which are meant to cast doubt on the authenticity of the data being collected. We need change… and we need it NOW!

An imbalance between rich and poor is the oldest and most fatal ailment of all republics. — Plutarch (46-120 AD)

In a movement which started in Kuala Lumpur on July 30, 2011 with Occupy Dataran which then migrated to New York City and San Francisco on September 17, 2011, with Occupy Wall Street and Occupy San Francisco and has now spread to more than 95 cities around the US, Europe and Canada. The grassroots demonstrations against corporate bailouts, illegal foreclosures, corporate greed, income inequality and high rates of unemployment have flourished recently online and have become a significant presence in Canadian cities like Vancouver, Montreal, Toronto and Calgary. The people or the 99% as they like to be referred are simply demanding change and rightly so. After years if not decades of social injustice and inequality, the 99% are beginning to speak out.

As I continue to monitor and watch the movement unfold, I’m baffled by the lack of commitment to the Occupy Movement Everywhere. A very compelling movement which is long overdue, yet lacks the momentum needed to bring around real change.   

"Resistance has always been most effective when exercised by those taught that they were the most powerless."

Just who, and where are the 99% who want and demand change? Where are they hiding? Has the Occupy Movement fallen on deaf ears or are people just too afraid to speak out against their oppressors? Perhaps most are contented with paying exorbitant taxes and earning pittance wages while corporate greed has become abundant and commonplace, hastily destroying the very fabric of our society for future generations. And still… their voices stagnant.

I watch in disgust as even among their own there is no solidarity to the cause. The backbiters and wannabe’s more worried about their own egocentric aspirations than those to which would benefit all mankind. They believe they belong to the 99% yet they want little if anything to do with the movement except to share in the rewards, should their be any. Depending what side of the percentage your on, the rewards could be irrefutable.

I read in disgust how lately the politicians and their henchmen now only want to quell the Occupy Movements as they become afraid of the growing momentum. How the corporate and government controlled media downplays the movement instead of airing and talking about the real issues at hand. (How often have we seen the media actually talking with the occupiers and telling their side of things?) Not often enough I’m afraid! What ever happened to Freedom of Speech and Freedom to Assemble as defined in Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?

Oh yeah… That was written for the 1% to oppress the 99%

I have to wonder though… With all the determination of the 99% where will this movement lead? Can anything good become of it? What will it change? What legacy may it pass down to our future generations? Personally, being part of that 99% I would hope that this movement continues to flourish and prosper. We desperately need change and we need it now. My heart goes out to everyone in the occupation who strive to bring about real change and I pray we can achieve our common goals without prejudice, violence and with much dignity.

Remember, we are the 99%!



Perhaps David Suzuki says it best.

“The course of human history is constantly changing. It's up to all of us to join the conversation to help steer it to a better path than the one we are on. Maybe our one demand should be of ourselves: Care enough to do something.”

As the debate over UBB (Usage Based Billing) rages on, it would seem that  the ‘Big Telecom’  have all the right answers, or so they would like us to believe. Shame on them! I for one am growing tired of hearing how they need to pay for the infrastructure already in place when we all, as consumers, are being over billed for the services we now receive. Just why do they now want to own the internet? Bottom line… it’s just another money grab. I agree that they may very well own the backbone, (the wires, fibre optics, ect)but the internet is a vast infrastructure with many nodes,  avenues and stations all of which the "’Big Telecom’ have contributed nothing to, so why is it now they feel they should profit off of others? Millions of corporations, businesses and consumers the world round have all contributed to the infrastructure of the internet so should we not reap some rewards also?
A recent article on The Globe and Mail does well to sum it up nicely.

Bell’s vision is an Internet that’s more like your cellphone. Treat every new Internet application as a “feature” that incurs a new monthly fee. Charge a “termination fee” if you get sick of how things are going. Above all, make everything consumers do cost more!

Enough is ENOUGH!

“When you invest zero, yeah, it’s pretty easy to say the cost-per-gig or per-bit is small. But when you invest billions, you’ve got to generate a return”  Mirko Bibic - Bell’s senior vice-president for regulatory affairs

A recent ruling from the CRTC to allow the big telecom companies ie: the Big Three, (BCE Bell, TELUS Corp, Roger’s Communications) to charge subscribers a Pay Per Usage fee is drawing heavy criticism and rightly so.  Just how much should we have to pay to access the internet, and just what is to be the outcome of a metered internet? Are we not paying enough already?


How many times have we all seen this before? Seems to me that this is just another money grab from the big corporations who only have one thing on their minds. The almighty dollar. (Let the rich get richer while the poor get poorer…) Myself, I’m getting real tired of this. I have more than enough hands in my pockets already!

Listening to them trying to justify their actions by talking about the billions spent on infrastructure just leaves me feeling sick to my stomach. What about the billions they overcharge their consumers for the shoddy cable and cellular services where every thing you do seems to cost you extra? Now they want to control and take over the internet as well! Please, give us a break!


For myself, I find this very disturbing. As a web developer and someone who enjoys streaming different forms of media over the internet, it’s hard to comprehend just why I, or anyone for that matter, should have to pay any additional fee for content that’s more graphic intensive or consumes more bandwidth, when  that’s the driving force behind the internet today.  Most sites today are very graphic intensive and if you stream media you’re bound to consume some bandwidth.  An average person on the web today could easily consume between 50 to 100 gigs of bandwidth per month. As new sites become more graphic intensive and consume more bandwidth then their predecessor, why is it the consumer should have to pick up the tab?

Even non-tech-savvy users are bumping up against download limits, as households seek more entertainment online and connect gaming consoles to the Internet!

It’s a complex issue with many sides but having a pay per use billing system in place will bring the internet to a standstill and will stifle new innovation. I honestly don’t believe that the big three are hurting because of lost bandwidth. However they are more likely hurting because of the potential for billions more of our hard earned money pouring into their coffer has escaped their grasp. Let’s hope that the recent ire of big businesses who rely on heavy data transmissions and the intervention of the Harper Government puts a stop to this blarney that the telecom companies would like us to believe. If not, perhaps we may wake up one day to find what once was, is no more thanks to the greed of a very wealthy few…

As to the evil which results from a censorship, it is impossible to measure it, for it is impossible to tell where it ends.

1.  suppression of published or broadcast material: the suppression of all or part of a play, movie, letter, or publication considered offensive or a threat to security
2.  suppression of something objectionable: the suppression or attempted suppression of something regarded as objectionable